Unfortunately, even a solid Internet speed test tool wouldn't be able to differentiate between a standard or bonded MoCA 2.0 connection for your adapters, since your spec'd Internet rate is below the expected standard MoCA 2.0 effective throughput of 300-400 Mbps. The only way to confirm the theory would be if you had 2 PCs with Gigabit NICs, allowing you to test the MoCA segment's throughput using iPerf or another LAN testing tool. (2x 700 Mbps = 1400 Mbps so your 670 Mbps PHY rate should be, effectively, 1340 Mbps if using two bonded channels) But the "1400 Mbps" rate would come from bonded MoCA 2.0 using 2 MoCA channels (the "bonded" bit!), rather than the single channel of standard MoCA 2.0. The adapters would surely need to be capable of these rates direct-connected before one would expect to reach the rates with the adapters placed into their permanent locations on the coax plant.Ĭlick to expand.As I've recently posted, I now believe that may be the best TX PHY Rate that you'll see for MoCA 2.0 (700 being the theoretical max just like -30 dBm being the max theoretical power reduction). If you can't get near bonded MoCA 2.0 rates with the MoCA adapters direct-connected, there must be some configuration or firmware issue with the adapters. Perform a LAN segment speed test, requiring two computers, one at either end of the segment to be tested, to measure the maximum effective throughput of the network segment.Perform an Internet speed test (understanding that the Internet connection would likely be the bottleneck in the test, so it wouldn't reveal the true performance of the MoCA connection).Check the MoCA stats (ideally seeing near -30 dBm TX power and approaching bonded MoCA 2.0 PHY rate, 1400 Mbps).
Check the link lights to confirm connectivity (obvious).There are 4 levels of testing/verification you could do with the MoCA adapters direct-connected via a coax cable:
0 kommentar(er)
